You will not find a price list on this page, and that is deliberate, not evasive.
A fixed number on a screen would either overcharge a simple workflow or badly underprice a complex one, and you would have no way to tell which. So we price against the thing that actually matters, the workflow we run and what it returns, and we tell you the full model in writing before you commit to anything.
the workflow we run and what it returns
the full model in writing before you commit to anything
Here is what is always true.
We do not discount, we de-risk.
The honest reason is that the right price depends entirely on the work. Automating a single follow-up sequence and automating nine modules of a government ERP are not the same job, and pretending they cost the same, or posting a number that only fits one of them, would be the opposite of helpful.
There is a second reason, and it matters more. The question that should drive the decision is not what does this cost, it is what is the manual version already costing you. The hours your team spends on repetitive work, the leads that book elsewhere after hours, the revenue that leaks out of a broken handoff, all of that is a bill you are already paying, every month, whether or not you ever hire us. Our pricing is scoped against that, against what the workflow returns when an agent runs it, so the decision is a comparison between two real numbers, not a leap toward an abstract one. You will have both before you commit.
Stage one.
For anyone deciding whether an agent makes sense at all.
We map one workflow end to end and come back with a written picture of where your hours and revenue are going, the one workflow to start with, and an honest read on what running it would return, including when the answer is that you should not build. It is real work with a real deliverable, and it stands on its own whatever you decide next.
Stage two.
For teams ready to prove it on their own operation, not a demo.
We put one agent live on one workflow inside your stack, pointed at a number you agreed on, run and governed by us, and reported on regularly. It is deliberately contained, small enough to decide on quickly, real enough to prove the outcome on your actual work. This is where most engagements begin, because it turns the whole question from will this work into here is what it did.
Stage three.
For operations ready to scale what the pilot proved.
We expand the agent across the workflows that matter, run and monitor them, govern quality with QualiCore, and report against the numbers each one was pointed at. You get a clear engagement model in writing before this stage begins, so scaling is a decision made on evidence, not on faith.
You get a clear model in writing before any commitment, so there are no surprises on an invoice.
Your systems stay the system of record at every stage, your records live in your tools, not ours.
And we do not discount our way into a deal, because a discount is just a signal the first price was not honest. What we do instead is de-risk, the audit stands alone, and the pilot proves the outcome on real work before you scale. That is a better deal for a serious buyer than any discount, because it removes the actual risk, which is spending on a build that does not land.
It is worth naming the option nobody puts on a pricing page. Doing nothing has a price too, and for most of the operators we work with it is the highest one on the list.
The audit exists to put a real number on that, so you can weigh what an agent costs against what the status quo is already costing you, and make the call on evidence.
This is not theoretical pricing for theoretical results. Telecom Foundation runs nine automated Odoo modules with us. Sirius Solutions Global runs insurance verification through our agent at roughly fifty calls a day. Advanzatech booked seventy qualified meetings in month two. When we scope a price against what a workflow will return, it is grounded in what we have already returned for operators like you. Read the full stories on our customers page.
Operators who care more about what a workflow returns than about the lowest sticker price, and who would rather prove an outcome on a contained pilot than gamble on a big build. If you want a partner accountable for a result, this model is built for you.
It is a weaker fit if you are shopping purely on the cheapest hourly rate to execute a spec you have already fully decided, with no interest in whether it is the right thing to build. There are cheaper vendors for that, and we will say so plainly rather than pretend to compete on price alone.
Because a fixed price would either overcharge a simple workflow or underprice a complex one, and you would have no way to know which you were getting. Scoping the price to the workflow keeps it honest, and you get the full model in writing after the audit, before you commit to anything, so you are never guessing.
Book the audit call and we map where you are losing time and revenue, tell you what an agent would return, and give you a clear engagement model in writing. No number on a screen you cannot trust, just an honest comparison between two real costs.
